<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/</link>
<title>#FF00AA - Liens</title>
<description></description>
<dc:language>fr</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
<dc:date>2010-03-11T04:06:21+01:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.garoo.net/" />
<atom:link href="http://www.ff00aa.com/rss/fr/links.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<item>
<title>“Amazon.com’s 1-Click patent confirmed following re-exam”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/11/10695-amazon-com-s-1-click-patent-confirmed-following-re-exam/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/11/10695-amazon-com-s-1-click-patent-confirmed-following-re-exam/</guid>
<description>techflash.comThe U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is confirming Amazon.com’s controversial 1-Click patent following a re-examination that lasted more than four years.
That’s just depressing.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/03/amazons_1-click_patent_confirmed_following_re-exam.html">techflash.com</a></p><blockquote><p>The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is confirming Amazon.com’s controversial 1-Click patent following a re-examination that lasted more than four years.</p>
</blockquote><p>That’s just depressing.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-11T04:06:19+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Apple ne sauvegarde pas son Time Tunnel”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/09/10690-apple-ne-sauvegarde-pas-son-time-tunnel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/09/10690-apple-ne-sauvegarde-pas-son-time-tunnel/</guid>
<description>macgeneration.comTime Machine aurait pu s’appeler Time Tunnel, ainsi que le relève le site Patently Apple. Cette marque, déposée par Apple à la fin de l’année 2006, est désormais abandonnée (Time Machine est arrivé avec Mac OS X Leopard en octobre 2007).
On comprend mieux, d’un coup, l’interface de Time Machine. Je me demande s’ils ont abandonné à cause de droits sur le nom, ou parce que la spirale donnait des vertiges aux utilisateurs.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p><a href="http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/09/10690-apple-ne-sauvegarde-pas-son-time-tunnel/" style="border: none;"><img src="http://www.garoo.net/photos/auto/255x150/2010/03/20100309-181048.png" width="255" height="150" alt="" title="" /></a></p><p class="link"><a href="http://www.macgeneration.com/news/voir/146461/apple-ne-sauvegarde-pas-son-time-tunnel">macgeneration.com</a></p><blockquote><p>Time Machine aurait pu s’appeler Time Tunnel, ainsi que le relève le site Patently Apple. Cette marque, déposée par Apple à la fin de l’année 2006, est désormais abandonnée (Time Machine est arrivé avec Mac OS X Leopard en octobre 2007).</p>
</blockquote><p>On <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=time%20tunnel">comprend mieux, d’un coup, l’interface de Time Machine</a>. Je me demande s’ils ont abandonné à cause de <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060036/">droits sur le nom</a>, ou parce que la spirale donnait des vertiges aux utilisateurs.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-09T18:12:40+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Apple’s New Stance On ‘Cookie Cutter’ Apps: Add More Features Or Perish”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/08/10688-apple-s-new-stance-on-cookie-cutter-apps-add-more-features-or-perish/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/08/10688-apple-s-new-stance-on-cookie-cutter-apps-add-more-features-or-perish/</guid>
<description>techcrunch.comBetween the developers I spoke to, the consensus was this: Apple doesn’t appear to be opposed to ‘app generators’ and templates per se, but in the last month or so it has started cracking down on basic applications that are little more than RSS feeds or glorified business cards. In short, Apple doesn’t want people using native applications for things that a basic web app could accomplish.
Nevermind the part about pulling the rug from yet another bunch of iPhone-based businesses, as it’s par for the course by now, but this particular rule is bullshit. Some sites have dedicated readers who want to have a shortcut or two on their Springboard — and most users don’t know, or want to know, about manually adding a shortcut from within Safari. They just want to click a link and download an app, because Apple has spent the last year emphasizing that "there’s an app for that."
I understand, and support, the desire to remove those apps from App Store listings — but not banning them altogether.
If Apple wants to approve everything that can be installed on an iPhone (for security’s sake, let’s say) and doesn’t want to pollute the App Store, here’s a novel idea: just approve the apps in such a way that they don’t appear in listings and search but are only accessible by using the direct URL. Or are they also trying to cut down the in-house testers’ workload?
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/07/apple-cookie-cutter-apps/">techcrunch.com</a></p><blockquote><p>Between the developers I spoke to, the consensus was this: Apple doesn’t appear to be opposed to ‘app generators’ and templates per se, but in the last month or so it has started cracking down on basic applications that are little more than RSS feeds or glorified business cards. In short, Apple doesn’t want people using native applications for things that a basic web app could accomplish.</p>
</blockquote><p>Nevermind the part about pulling the rug from yet another bunch of iPhone-based businesses, as it’s par for the course by now, but this particular rule is bullshit. Some sites have dedicated readers who want to have a shortcut or two on their Springboard — and most users don’t know, or want to know, about manually adding a shortcut from within Safari. They just want to click a link and download an app, because Apple has spent the last year emphasizing that &ldquo;there’s an app for that.&rdquo;</p>
<p>I&nbsp;understand, and support, the desire to remove those apps from App&nbsp;Store <i>listings</i> — but not banning them altogether.</p>
<p>If Apple wants to approve everything that can be installed on an iPhone (for security’s sake, let’s say) and doesn’t want to pollute the App&nbsp;Store, here’s a novel idea: just approve the apps in such a way that they don’t appear in listings and search but are only accessible by using the direct URL. Or are they also trying to cut down the in-house testers’ workload?</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-08T16:35:25+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>Ambilight for video</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/08/10687-ambilight-for-lt-video-gt/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/08/10687-ambilight-for-lt-video-gt/</guid>
<description>beautifulpixels.comI can’t believe this works.
Of course, it doubles or triples the amount of CPU power it takes for my Mac mini to play a video (haven’t even tried on the old iMac), and it’s not very pleasant to watch (do real Ambilight TVs lag so much?), but it’s a nice tech demo for HTML 5.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://beautifulpixels.com/web/ambilight-html5/">beautifulpixels.com</a></p><p>I&nbsp;can’t believe this works.</p>
<p>Of course, it doubles or triples the amount of CPU power it takes for my Mac&nbsp;mini to play a video (haven’t even tried on the old iMac), and it’s not very pleasant to watch (do real Ambilight&nbsp;TVs lag so much?), but it’s a nice tech demo for HTML&nbsp;5.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-08T15:02:55+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Microsoft’s Courier ’digital journal’: exclusive pictures and details”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/05/10686-microsoft-s-courier-digital-journal-exclusive-pictures-and-details/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/05/10686-microsoft-s-courier-digital-journal-exclusive-pictures-and-details/</guid>
<description>engadget.comThat looks much smaller than it did in my head — pretty much an iPad folded in two. It better have a super-high-resolution screen if it’s gonna be of any use.
 As we’ve heard, the interface appears to be pen-based and centered around drawing and writing, with built-in handwriting recognition and a corresponding web site that allows access to everything entered into the device in a blog-like format complete with comments.
Cool.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p><a href="http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/05/10686-microsoft-s-courier-digital-journal-exclusive-pictures-and-details/" style="border: none;"><img src="http://www.garoo.net/photos/auto/255x150/2010/03/20100305-193642.png" width="255" height="150" alt="" title="" /></a></p><p class="link"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/microsofts-courier-digital-journal-exclusive-pictures-and-de/">engadget.com</a></p><p>That looks much smaller than it did in my head — pretty much an iPad folded in two. It better have a super-high-resolution screen if it’s gonna be of any use.</p>
<p class="spacer">&nbsp;</p><blockquote><p>As we’ve heard, the interface appears to be pen-based and centered around drawing and writing, with built-in handwriting recognition and a corresponding web site that allows access to everything entered into the device in a blog-like format complete with comments.</p>
</blockquote><p>Cool.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-05T19:37:05+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“HTC: Don’t Carry Your Nexus One In Your Pocket”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/05/10685-htc-don-t-carry-your-nexus-one-in-your-pocket/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/05/10685-htc-don-t-carry-your-nexus-one-in-your-pocket/</guid>
<description>gizmodo.comAfter being recommended by Google to speak to HTC’s technical support, Crave was told that "putting a phone in a tight pair of jeans and sitting down would usually cause the kind of damage," and that "people sometimes forget that they don’t go in pockets."
Nice.
Apple’s humidity sensors don’t seem so bad now.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5486397/htc-dont-carry-your-nexus-one-in-your-pocket">gizmodo.com</a></p><blockquote><p>After being recommended by Google to speak to HTC’s technical support, Crave was told that "putting a phone in a tight pair of jeans and sitting down would usually cause the kind of damage," and that "people sometimes forget that they don’t go in pockets."</p>
</blockquote><p>Nice.</p>
<p>Apple’s humidity sensors don’t seem so bad now.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-05T19:32:06+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Finger Fail: Why Most Touchscreens Miss the Point”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/05/10684-finger-fail-why-most-touchscreens-miss-the-point/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/05/10684-finger-fail-why-most-touchscreens-miss-the-point/</guid>
<description>wired.comYou’re not crazy, and neither are we: The touchscreen on the Apple iPhone really is more responsive than the screens on the BlackBerry Storm, the Motorola Droid, the Nexus One and many other phones, even though all of these devices use essentially the same touch-sensing hardware.
Though handset makers buy their touchscreens as components from the same select pool of suppliers, a good touchscreen experience requires more than just hardware. It requires a bit of design alchemy blending software, engineering and calibration for the perfect feel. Few smartphone makers have managed to get that balance right, say experts.
Followed by a long article correctly concluding that Steve Jobs’s perfectionism is to thank for this.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/03/touchscreens-smartphones/">wired.com</a></p><blockquote><p>You’re not crazy, and neither are we: The touchscreen on the Apple iPhone really is more responsive than the screens on the BlackBerry Storm, the Motorola Droid, the Nexus One and many other phones, even though all of these devices use essentially the same touch-sensing hardware.</p>
<p>Though handset makers buy their touchscreens as components from the same select pool of suppliers, a good touchscreen experience requires more than just hardware. It requires a bit of design alchemy blending software, engineering and calibration for the perfect feel. Few smartphone makers have managed to get that balance right, say experts.</p>
</blockquote><p>Followed by a long article correctly concluding that Steve Jobs’s perfectionism is to thank for this.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-05T19:22:33+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“According to ATT CEO: iPad will be a ‘Wi-Fi driven product’”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/04/10683-according-to-at-amp-t-ceo-ipad-will-be-a-wi-fi-driven-product/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/04/10683-according-to-at-amp-t-ceo-ipad-will-be-a-wi-fi-driven-product/</guid>
<description>iphonefreak.com“My expectation is that there’s not going to be a lot of people out there looking for another subscription,” he said during a webcast of an investor conference, adding that the device would be a mainly “Wi-Fi driven product.”
Translation: "We absolutely haven’t planned to provide the network capacity needed for people to use the 3G data plan we’re offering. And if you do start using it, we’ll have to slap a 500MB reasonable use limit. Unlimited data for $30? Come on, if you believed we actually meant it, it’s your own damn fault for being so gullible."
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://www.iphonefreak.com/2010/03/according-to-att-ceo-ipad-will-be-a-wi-fi-driven-product.html">iphonefreak.com</a></p><blockquote><p>“My expectation is that there’s not going to be a lot of people out there looking for another subscription,” he said during a webcast of an investor conference, adding that the device would be a mainly “Wi-Fi driven product.”</p>
</blockquote><p>Translation: &ldquo;We absolutely haven’t planned to provide the network capacity needed for people to use the 3G&nbsp;data plan we’re offering. And if you do start using it, we’ll have to slap a 500MB &lsquo;reasonable use&rsquo; limit. Unlimited data for $30? Come on, if you believed we actually meant it, it’s your own damn fault for being so gullible.&rdquo;</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-04T14:17:05+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Google Releases Gesture Search for Android”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/04/10682-google-releases-gesture-search-for-android/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/04/10682-google-releases-gesture-search-for-android/</guid>
<description>mashable.comGesture Search is pretty straightforward: you open it up and then draw letters. Draw a M and you’ll get contacts, bookmarks, and apps that start with M. Draw an o and you’ll get results starting with “Mo,” and so on until you find what you’re looking for. Queries can also be erased by drawing a line left to right, while drawing right to left removes the last letter in the current sequence.
Want!
But for Apple to do that on the Spotlight home screen would mean to acknowledge that the software keyboard isn’t perfect, and I don’t see that happening.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://mashable.com/2010/03/03/google-gesture-search/">mashable.com</a></p><blockquote><p>Gesture Search is pretty straightforward: you open it up and then draw letters. Draw a M and you’ll get contacts, bookmarks, and apps that start with M. Draw an o and you’ll get results starting with “Mo,” and so on until you find what you’re looking for. Queries can also be erased by drawing a line left to right, while drawing right to left removes the last letter in the current sequence.</p>
</blockquote><p>Want!</p>
<p>But for Apple to do that on the Spotlight home screen would mean to acknowledge that the software keyboard isn’t perfect, and I&nbsp;don’t see that happening.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-04T14:00:11+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Google’s SEO Report Card”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/03/10681-official-google-webmaster-central-blog-google-s-seo-report-card/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/03/10681-official-google-webmaster-central-blog-google-s-seo-report-card/</guid>
<description>googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.comAn interesting point that I don’t remember giving much thought about, even though it should be obvious: nobody cares about the title that’s displayed on top of a browser window; it should be 100% optimized for when it’s show in search results.
Also, the report mentions that you can go to Google’s Webmaster Tools and decide which variants of your URLs should be prioritized for which geographical user base; I have to check that out. Nah, it’s useless except for some very exceptional cases.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/03/googles-seo-report-card.html">googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com</a></p><p>An interesting point that I&nbsp;don’t remember giving much thought about, even though it should be obvious: nobody cares about the &lt;title&gt; that’s displayed on top of a browser window; it should be 100% optimized for when it’s show in search results.</p>
<p><s>Also, the report mentions that you can go to <a href="https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/">Google’s Webmaster Tools</a> and decide which variants of your URLs should be prioritized for which geographical user base; I&nbsp;have to check that out.</s> Nah, it’s useless except for some very exceptional cases.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-03T17:52:35+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Apple vs HTC: a patent breakdown”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/02/10680-apple-vs-htc-a-patent-breakdown/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/02/10680-apple-vs-htc-a-patent-breakdown/</guid>
<description>engadget.comThe upshot of this whole thing — with patents covering very basic aspects of object-oriented operating system development — is that you can’t create a new operating system nowadays (or a phone, or much of anything) unless you have a portfolio of patents of your own so that you can force every other player in the field to sign a non-aggression pact with you, like Microsoft and Apple did back then.
Or you can stay in Europe. (For now.)
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/02/apple-vs-htc-a-patent-breakdown/">engadget.com</a></p><p>The upshot of this whole thing — with patents covering very basic aspects of object-oriented operating system development — is that you can’t create a new operating system nowadays (or a phone, or much of anything) unless you have a portfolio of patents of your own so that you can force every other player in the field to sign a non-aggression pact with you, like Microsoft and Apple did back then.</p>
<p>Or you can stay in Europe. (For now.)</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-02T21:07:13+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“HTC feeling Apple’s fury over smartphone patents”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/02/10679-htc-feeling-apple-s-fury-over-smartphone-patents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/02/10679-htc-feeling-apple-s-fury-over-smartphone-patents/</guid>
<description>arstechnica.comWe think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.
Of course, most of those are bullshit patents. Uh, I mean, software patents.
Gotta wonder what’s the ultimate motivation for this. I guess it still smarts Apple, and Jobs personally, that Microsoft was able to copy all it could from MacOS and, now that Apple has pretty much reinvented the smartphone and does own patents, it’s tempting to use them.
But the timing is weird, right after Nokia slapped Apple with the same kind of suit, and just about the same rhetoric. Is Apple bullying forward, going after the smallest possible actor of the field, the one who won’t have patents of its own to fight back with? Or could they think it will make them look more serious in their negotiations (or trials) with Nokia?
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/03/htc-feeling-apples-fury-over-smartphone-patents.ars">arstechnica.com</a></p><blockquote><p>We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.</p>
</blockquote><p>Of course, most of those are bullshit patents. Uh, I&nbsp;mean, software patents.</p>
<p>Gotta wonder what’s the ultimate motivation for this. I&nbsp;guess it still smarts Apple, and Jobs personally, that Microsoft was able to copy all it could from MacOS and, now that Apple has pretty much reinvented the smartphone and does own patents, it’s tempting to use them.</p>
<p>But the timing is weird, right after Nokia slapped Apple with the same kind of suit, and just about the same rhetoric. Is Apple bullying forward, going after the smallest possible actor of the field, the one who won’t have patents of its own to fight back with? Or could they think it will make them look more serious in their negotiations (or trials) with Nokia?</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-02T19:40:55+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>"Coding error leads to uneven EU browser ballot distribution"</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/02/10678-coding-error-leads-to-uneven-eu-browser-ballot-distribution/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/03/02/10678-coding-error-leads-to-uneven-eu-browser-ballot-distribution/</guid>
<description>arstechnica.comSo there’s a very good chance that the issue here is an honest error. What is remarkable, though, is that it exists. This browser ballot, as simple as it is, has been months in the making. The decision to do the randomization client-side, where it depends on the web browser, rather than server-side, where it would be consistent for all users, is a little surprising. But most remarkable at all is that no one responsible for signing off and saying "that’s an acceptable response to the Competition Commission’s complaint" bothered to do this testing.
Or it would be remarkable if we weren’t talking about Microsoft.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2010/03/coding-error-leads-to-uneven-eu-browser-ballot-distribution.ars">arstechnica.com</a></p><blockquote><p>So there’s a very good chance that the issue here is an honest error. What is remarkable, though, is that it exists. This browser ballot, as simple as it is, has been months in the making. The decision to do the randomization client-side, where it depends on the web browser, rather than server-side, where it would be consistent for all users, is a little surprising. But most remarkable at all is that no one responsible for signing off and saying "that’s an acceptable response to the Competition Commission’s complaint" bothered to do this testing.</p>
</blockquote><p>Or it would be remarkable if we weren’t talking about Microsoft.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-03-02T13:46:30+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Steve Jobs personally calls iTunes contest winner…who didn’t believe it was him”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/27/10676-steve-jobs-personally-calls-itunes-contest-winner-who-didn-t-believe-it-was-him/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/27/10676-steve-jobs-personally-calls-itunes-contest-winner-who-didn-t-believe-it-was-him/</guid>
<description>9to5mac.comSulcer, who is a 70 year old grandfather to nine, won by purchasing Johnny Cash’s “Guess Things Happen That Way”.  He had no idea Apple was even having a contest.
Oh, come on. You want me to believe that the person who downloaded the 10-billionth iTunes song just happens to be a technology-literate 70-year-old grandfather who knows who Steve Jobs is — and listens to Johnny Cash?
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/Steve-Jobs-calls-iTunes-winner-24569826">9to5mac.com</a></p><blockquote><p>Sulcer, who is a 70 year old grandfather to nine, won by purchasing Johnny Cash’s “Guess Things Happen That Way”.  He had no idea Apple was even having a contest.</p>
</blockquote><p>Oh, come on. You want me to believe that the person who downloaded the 10-billionth iTunes song just <i>happens</i> to be a technology-literate 70-year-old grandfather who knows who Steve Jobs is — and listens to Johnny Cash?</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-02-27T14:13:05+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Compress Your Mac with Squeeze”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/26/10675-compress-your-mac-with-squeeze/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/26/10675-compress-your-mac-with-squeeze/</guid>
<description>macstories.netSqueeze is very simple and straightforward: basically, it can keep track of some selected folders and compress them without visible differences to the user, but saving space in the background. It uses the latest HFS-comrpession technology built in Snow Leopard to compress all the files within a folder you choose to be processed. After the compression process, Mac OS will read the file again just fine […]
I’ve downloaded it (hey, it’s free on MacHeist, and they’re not even forcing you to tweet this time), but before I decide whether to install it I’ll wait for the technical reviews that don’t gush about it.
There’s a reason why OS X doesn’t compress the whole drive by default, and until I read more about the trade-offs implied by using Squeeze, I’ll stay on the fence. (The reason could simply be that it makes the drive unreadable from not-10.6 machines, which isn’t much of a problem.)
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://www.macstories.net/reviews/squeeze-macheist/">macstories.net</a></p><blockquote><p>Squeeze is very simple and straightforward: basically, it can keep track of some selected folders and compress them without visible differences to the user, but saving space in the background. It uses the latest HFS-comrpession technology built in Snow Leopard to compress all the files within a folder you choose to be processed. After the compression process, Mac OS will read the file again just fine&nbsp;[…]</p>
</blockquote><p>I’ve downloaded it (hey, it’s free on MacHeist, and they’re not even <i>forcing</i> you to tweet this time), but before I&nbsp;decide whether to install it I’ll wait for the technical reviews that don’t gush about it.</p>
<p>There’s a reason why OS&nbsp;X doesn’t compress the whole drive by default, and until I&nbsp;read more about the trade-offs implied by using Squeeze, I’ll stay on the fence. (The reason could simply be that it makes the drive unreadable from not-10.6 machines, which isn’t much of a problem.)</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-02-26T16:56:53+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Dan Frommer Says Palm’s Decline ’Shows That Apple Is Screwed Without Steve Jobs’”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/25/10674-dan-frommer-says-palm-s-decline-shows-that-apple-is-screwed-without-steve-jobs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/25/10674-dan-frommer-says-palm-s-decline-shows-that-apple-is-screwed-without-steve-jobs/</guid>
<description>daringfireball.netAnd if a bunch of [former] Apple geniuses can’t kick butt on their own at Palm, how are they going to kick butt without Steve at Apple?
That’s an interesting point, and I disagree with Gruber’s arguments about it. The thing is, though, that Palm failed for three reasons: (1) they were going against Apple, (2) they were two years late on the iPhone market, and (3) they didn’t have enough cash for the first webOS phone to be really good hardware.
None of those reasons will apply to Apple post-Jobs (for a while).
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/25/steve-jobs">daringfireball.net</a></p><blockquote><p>And if a bunch of [former] Apple geniuses can’t kick butt on their own at Palm, how are they going to kick butt without Steve at Apple?</p>
</blockquote><p>That’s an interesting point, and I&nbsp;disagree with Gruber’s arguments about it. The thing is, though, that Palm failed for three reasons: (1) they were going against Apple, (2) they were two years late on the iPhone market, and (3) they didn’t have enough cash for the first webOS phone to be really good hardware.</p>
<p>None of those reasons will apply to Apple post-Jobs (for a while).</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-02-25T19:23:05+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Facebook Glitch Sends Messages to Wrong People”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/25/10673-facebook-glitch-sends-messages-to-wrong-people/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/25/10673-facebook-glitch-sends-messages-to-wrong-people/</guid>
<description>blogs.wsj.comLast night, in an embarrassing glitch for Facebook that raises questions about privacy on the site, some users of the social-networking service began getting hundreds of personal messages that weren’t intended for them.
Jesus-Christ, you can not afford to fuck that up.
Well, I guess you can, evidently.
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/02/25/facebook-glitch-sends-messages-to-the-wrong-people/">blogs.wsj.com</a></p><blockquote><p>Last night, in an embarrassing glitch for Facebook that raises questions about privacy on the site, some users of the social-networking service began getting hundreds of personal messages that weren’t intended for them.</p>
</blockquote><p>Jesus-Christ, you can not afford to fuck that up.</p>
<p>Well, I&nbsp;guess you can, evidently.</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-02-25T18:34:06+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Get a P8TCH at the Boing Boing Bazaar”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/25/10672-get-a-p8tch-at-the-boing-boing-bazaar/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/25/10672-get-a-p8tch-at-the-boing-boing-bazaar/</guid>
<description>boingboing.netFor $24.95, the buyer gets a 2x4-inch, velcro-backed commando patch with a cryptic design, and a unique QRcode.  Not "unique" as in "remarkable", but rather "unique" as in "each patch is different from every other".  Each patch has a short URL embedded on it that is controlled by the owner. You can choose to send it to your RSS feed, a PayPal donation page, or a YouTube video of last week’s comedically inept attempt to sled down a hill.
I kinda totally want one. (But $25?)
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/24/get-a-p8tch-at-the-b.html">boingboing.net</a></p><blockquote><p>For $24.95, the buyer gets a 2x4-inch, velcro-backed commando patch with a cryptic design, and a unique QRcode.  Not "unique" as in "remarkable", but rather "unique" as in "each patch is different from every other".  Each patch has a short URL embedded on it that is controlled by the owner. You can choose to send it to your RSS feed, a PayPal donation page, or a YouTube video of last week’s comedically inept attempt to sled down a hill.</p>
</blockquote><p>I&nbsp;kinda totally want one. (But $25?)</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-02-25T00:43:19+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Apple Removes Explicit Option From iTunes”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/25/10671-apple-removes-explicit-option-from-itunes/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/25/10671-apple-removes-explicit-option-from-itunes/</guid>
<description>gizmodo.comHe just got off the telephone with Apple, who confirmed the removal. According to the developer, Apple said that, while they are thinking about it, "it’s not going to happen anytime soon."
Goddamnit, stop toying with us!
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5479497/apple-removes-explicit-option-from-itunes">gizmodo.com</a></p><blockquote><p>He just got off the telephone with Apple, who confirmed the removal. According to the developer, Apple said that, while they are thinking about it, "it’s not going to happen anytime soon."</p>
</blockquote><p>Goddamnit, stop toying with us!</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-02-25T00:04:52+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


<item>
<title>“Apple creating "explicit" category for App Store”</title>
<link>http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/24/10670-apple-creating-explicit-category-for-app-store/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ff00aa.com/fr/archives/2010/02/24/10670-apple-creating-explicit-category-for-app-store/</guid>
<description>tuaw.comWe received a tip and a screenshot (seen above) from a developer who pointed out the new "Explicit" category in the tool used to submit apps into the store.
What, now?!
</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0 0 0 5px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 3px #ff66ff;"><p class="link"><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/02/24/apple-creating-explicit-category-for-app-store/">tuaw.com</a></p><blockquote><p>We received a tip and a screenshot (seen above) from a developer who pointed out the new "Explicit" category in the tool used to submit apps into the store.</p>
</blockquote><p>What, now?!</p>
</div><img src="http://www.garoo.net/rssview.html" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
<dc:date>2010-02-24T18:35:09+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


</channel></rss>